Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Initiate Bowel Protocol per Policy and Physician Orders

Raymond, Washington Survey Completed on 08-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to initiate bowel interventions in accordance with physician orders and facility policy for three residents who experienced extended periods without a bowel movement. The facility's policy required licensed nurses to assess residents and begin a bowel protocol if no or minimal bowel movement was documented for 64 hours. This protocol included administering Milk of Magnesia, followed by Bisacodyl suppository, and then a Fleet Enema if previous interventions were ineffective, as outlined in the residents' physician orders. For one resident, documentation showed a gap of approximately 118 hours between bowel movements, with no evidence in the Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) that the prescribed interventions were administered after the 64-hour threshold. Another resident experienced a 121-hour interval between bowel movements, and again, the EMAR did not reflect any medication intervention as required by the protocol. A third resident had a 130-hour gap between bowel movements, with no documentation of bowel protocol interventions during this period. Interviews with nursing staff and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the bowel protocol was not initiated as expected and that there were issues with documentation. Staff acknowledged that there should have been records of interventions during the periods of no bowel movement, but none were found. The failure to follow the established bowel management protocol resulted in unmet care needs for the affected residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙