Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plans for Urinary Incontinence

Puyallup, Washington Survey Completed on 07-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans addressing urinary incontinence for two residents. For the first resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including hip fracture with surgical repair, weakness, difficulty walking, and a need for assistance with personal care, the admission MDS indicated that the resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. However, review of the comprehensive care plan showed that incontinence was not listed, and there were no goals or interventions documented to address this need. For the second resident, who was admitted with dementia, overactive bladder, and a need for assistance with personal care, the admission MDS and facility documentation indicated frequent bladder incontinence. Despite this, the comprehensive care plan did not include incontinence until the date of discharge. During an interview, the DNS confirmed that care plans for incontinence should have been in place as soon as the need was identified through assessments.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙