Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Provide Patient-Centered Discharge Planning and Communication

Lynnwood, Washington Survey Completed on 06-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that discharge planning was patient-centered and involved both the resident and their representatives, as required by policy. For two residents reviewed, there was no evidence that the interdisciplinary team developed or documented a discharge plan that addressed the residents' goals, needs, or referrals to local agencies. Additionally, there was a lack of direct communication with the residents and their families regarding the discharge process, timeline, and preparation, despite facility policy requiring such involvement and documentation at least twenty-four hours prior to discharge. One resident, who was cognitively intact, and their family reported not receiving any information about discharge planning throughout the stay. The resident repeatedly asked staff for updates but was only informed of the discharge on the day it was to occur, leaving insufficient time to arrange transportation. Documentation in the electronic health record did not show any follow-up or involvement of the resident or family in the discharge planning process after an initial note, nor did it reflect any multidisciplinary team discussions or communication about the discharge timeline. Another resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired, also lacked documented discharge planning or communication with the family. The care plan indicated a need for 24/7 care at home, but there was no evidence that the discharge plan was reviewed or updated as the resident's cognitive status declined. Staff interviews confirmed that there was no documentation of communication with the resident or family, no record of team discussions, and no evidence that the family was prepared or received caregiver training prior to discharge.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙