Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
D

Failure to Accommodate Resident Food Allergies and Preferences

Sedro Woolley, Washington Survey Completed on 06-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident's menu and individual food plan met their documented nutritional needs and preferences. The resident, who had diagnoses including malnutrition and dysphagia and received extra calories via a PEG tube, was noted to have allergies and dislikes including gluten, eggs, mushrooms, mayonnaise, and tomato products. Despite this, observations showed that the resident was served a hamburger with mayonnaise and battered onion rings, which contained gluten, as well as gluten-free pasta with tomato sauce, which the resident disliked and refused to eat. The resident expressed dissatisfaction and concern about the presence of gluten and other disliked items in their meals. Interviews with staff revealed that meal tray cards listing allergies and dislikes were used to guide food preparation, but limitations in available gluten-free options from the food vendor resulted in the resident receiving inappropriate food items. The Food Services Director acknowledged that alternatives were not available for certain menu items, leading to the resident being served foods containing allergens or items they disliked. The facility's policy required accommodation of allergies and preferences, but this was not consistently implemented for the resident in question.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙