Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0692
D

Failure to Provide Adequate Nutrition, Meal Replacements, and Weight Monitoring

Federal Way, Washington Survey Completed on 05-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Staff failed to provide adequate nutritional care and meal replacements for multiple residents who consumed less than 50% of their meals. In one instance, a resident who was unable to feed themselves was left with a meal tray and not assisted until nearly an hour later, by which time the food was cold. The resident consumed less than 10% of the meal, and staff did not offer or document a meal replacement, contrary to facility policy. Staff interviews confirmed that meal replacements should be offered and documented when residents consume less than half of their meal, but this was not done. Another resident with diagnoses including morbid obesity, heart failure, and malnutrition, and who was lactose intolerant and diabetic, frequently refused facility meals. Staff offered inappropriate snacks such as milk and high-sugar items, despite knowing the resident's dietary restrictions. When the resident refused meals, staff did not consistently offer suitable meal alternatives or ensure that outside food was properly stored, as required by facility policy. Staff interviews revealed uncertainty about the provision of supplements and the storage of outside food. A third resident, at risk for malnutrition and with dysphagia, had physician orders for regular weight monitoring. Staff failed to obtain and accurately document weights as ordered, with several entries missing or marked as refused without evidence of alternative attempts. Staff acknowledged the failure to follow physician orders and the need for alternative weighing methods for residents who refuse care. These deficiencies in nutritional care, meal replacement, and weight monitoring were observed and confirmed through staff interviews and record reviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙