Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Implement Surgical Wound Care Orders

Colfax, Washington Survey Completed on 06-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement wound care orders for a resident who was admitted with pelvis fractures, muscle weakness, and recent surgical repairs, including a suprapubic catheter and surgical wounds to the hips and pubic area. Upon review, it was found that the hospital transfer orders specified surgical site wound care with dressing changes every 2-3 days for the bilateral pubis area, but these orders were not transcribed into the resident's medical record or carried out by staff. The clinical admission evaluation did not document the presence of surgical wounds or the need for wound care, and the care plan only generally referenced wound care without specific implementation of the required dressing changes. During observation and interview, the resident reported that the dressing on their pubic area had not been changed for 2-3 weeks and that the current dressing was from a previous hospital visit. The dressing was visibly soiled with dark yellow drainage. Staff interviews confirmed that the wound care orders from the hospital were not processed or implemented, and staff acknowledged the importance of monitoring wounds for signs of infection. The Director of Nursing stated that staff are expected to review and implement provider orders and update care plans accordingly, but this did not occur in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙