Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Implement Scheduled Toileting Program for Incontinent Resident

Pasco, Washington Survey Completed on 05-27-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement a scheduled toileting program for a resident who was frequently incontinent of bowel, despite being assessed as a candidate for such a program. The resident was cognitively intact, able to express needs, and dependent on staff for transfers and toileting hygiene. Documentation showed that the resident was not on a toileting program, and interviews revealed that the resident had not been offered or discussed a scheduled toileting program, even though they expressed interest in trying one and dissatisfaction with using briefs. The resident also reported not having access to a bedside commode and being unable to get to the bathroom independently. Staff interviews indicated that the facility's process for establishing toileting schedules included assessments and tracking bowel patterns to identify candidates for scheduled toileting. However, staff acknowledged that the resident's assessment had not been followed up appropriately, and the resident had not been identified or placed on a toileting program, despite having a documented pattern of large bowel movements during shower transfers. The facility's policy required care and services to restore as much normal bowel function as possible for residents admitted with incontinence, but this was not implemented for the resident in question.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙