Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
E

Failure to Honor Resident Food Preferences and Grievance Resolution

Tacoma, Washington Survey Completed on 06-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide food services that met the stated preferences of five out of eight sampled residents. Multiple residents reported that their menu selections and food preferences, such as specific meal choices and requests for double portions, were not honored. For example, one resident did not receive their ordered cheeseburger and had to request it directly from the kitchen, while another reported not receiving their requested hamburger, juice, and tea for lunch. Several residents filed grievances regarding not receiving double portions or specific meal items, but continued to experience the same issues despite the grievances being marked as resolved in the facility's log. Observations and record reviews confirmed that residents did not consistently receive the foods or portions indicated on their meal cards, such as double portions, condiments, or additional beverages. Interviews with dietary staff and the registered dietician revealed a lack of communication regarding residents' grievances and food preference changes, with the dietician unaware of several residents' requests for double portions. The administrator acknowledged that food preferences should be honored and that the ongoing issues did not meet facility expectations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙