Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
E

Deficient Clinical Record Accuracy and Maintenance

Seattle, Washington Survey Completed on 05-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the accuracy and proper maintenance of clinical records for several residents, resulting in multiple documentation deficiencies. For one resident, there was a discrepancy between the discharge date listed on the face sheet and the date documented in the nursing progress notes, with staff confirming the face sheet should have matched the progress notes. Another resident's clinical record contained hospice documents that actually belonged to a different resident, and staff acknowledged these documents were incorrectly filed. Additionally, a self-administration of medication evaluation form for another resident was found to be blank and not completed as required after assessment, which staff confirmed should have been done. A further review revealed that a resident's Level I PASARR form did not accurately reflect their diagnoses of depression and anxiety disorder, despite these being listed on the face sheet. Staff involved in the review and interviews confirmed that the PASARR form was incomplete and should have included the resident's mental health diagnoses. These findings demonstrate failures in maintaining accurate, complete, and resident-specific clinical records as required by professional standards.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙