Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Provide Privacy for Residents with Urinary Catheters

Seattle, Washington Survey Completed on 05-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide privacy for residents with urinary catheters, as evidenced by observations and interviews involving two residents. For both residents, their urinary catheter drainage bags were not covered with privacy bags and were visible from the hallway on multiple occasions. Staff members, including a Licensed Practical Nurse, a Certified Nursing Assistant, the Resident Care Manager, and the Director of Nursing, all acknowledged during interviews that the catheter bags should have been covered with privacy bags in accordance with facility policy and the residents' care plans. Review of the facility's policies confirmed that residents are to be treated with dignity and respect, and that catheter drainage bags should be kept covered. The care plan for one resident specifically required the drainage bag to remain covered. Despite these requirements, the lack of privacy bag coverage for the catheter drainage bags was directly observed and confirmed by staff, resulting in a failure to honor the residents' rights to dignity and privacy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙