Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0622
D

Failure to Permit Resident to Remain and Inadequate Discharge Documentation

Rural Retreat, Virginia Survey Completed on 04-08-2025

Penalty

Fine: $135,372
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to permit a resident with multiple complex diagnoses, including seizures, COPD, hypertension, anxiety, heart failure, a history of suicidal behavior, traumatic brain injury, major depressive disorder, and vascular dementia with psychotic disturbance, to remain in the facility. The resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required maximum assistance for most activities of daily living. Despite the resident's preferences for certain activities and his non-ambulatory status, the facility initiated a transfer to the emergency room following an incident where the resident reportedly exhibited behavioral issues, including hitting staff and making threats. However, documentation from hospice and EMTs indicated that the resident was calm and non-combative during their assessments, and the resident expressed a desire not to be transferred to the hospital. The facility administrator cited a policy requiring ER evaluation for aggressive behaviors, but the current administrator later clarified that this was not a formal policy but rather a section in the admission agreement. The facility issued a 30-day discharge notice after learning more about the resident's psychiatric history, despite a care plan being developed in collaboration with hospice to address his needs. Interviews with hospice staff revealed that the facility did not attempt to implement the agreed-upon interventions before issuing the discharge notice. The discharge notice cited the facility's inability to meet the resident's needs and concerns for the health, safety, and well-being of others, but there was no documentation of specific needs that could not be met or of attempts to address those needs as required by facility policy. Medication management for the resident was also inconsistent, with delays in starting prescribed medications and some orders not being administered as intended. Staff interviews indicated that while the resident had some behavioral incidents, there was no evidence that he attempted to harm other residents. The facility's own assessment stated that it could care for residents with psychiatric and behavioral needs, yet the documentation and actions taken did not reflect adequate attempts to meet this resident's needs prior to discharge. The required documentation supporting the discharge, including specific unmet needs and efforts to address them, was not found in the medical record.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙