Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0687
D

Failure to Provide Foot Care and Document Refusals

Ashland, Virginia Survey Completed on 08-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to provide appropriate foot care for one resident, resulting in long, untrimmed toenails that were observed to be uneven and approximately 1/8 inch from the nailbed. The resident, who was assessed as severely impaired in decision-making and required substantial to maximal assistance with personal hygiene and bathing, was seen walking barefoot in the hallway. The care plan documented that the resident had a self-care deficit related to dementia, lack of coordination, and hemiplegia, and also noted a history of refusing care, including foot care and podiatry services. However, there was no documentation in the nursing progress notes of refusals or attempts to trim the toenails after the last podiatry visit, which occurred several months prior to the observation. Staff interviews revealed that while the resident sometimes refused care, the expectation was that refusals should be documented and reported to the physician and responsible party. The facility's policies required daily grooming activities, including nail care, and documentation of care provided or refusals. Despite these requirements, the clinical record did not show evidence of toenail care or documentation of refusals after the last podiatry visit, indicating a lapse in following facility policy and in providing necessary foot care for the resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙