Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Provide Timely Incontinence Care for Cognitively Impaired Residents

Leesburg, Virginia Survey Completed on 05-21-2025

Penalty

Fine: $5,712
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to provide timely incontinence care for two residents who were both severely cognitively impaired and always incontinent, as documented in their most recent MDS assessments. For one resident with dementia, continuous observation over a period of more than four hours revealed that no nurse or CNA checked or provided incontinence care. When care was eventually attempted, the resident was found with a saturated incontinence brief containing both urine and feces, some of which was dried on the skin. The process of providing care was further complicated by improper transfer techniques and lack of effective communication between CNAs. For the second resident, who had a history of stroke and was also severely cognitively impaired and always incontinent, a similar period of observation showed no incontinence care was provided. The assigned CNA confirmed that care should be offered every two hours and acknowledged not being informed about the resident's care status from the previous shift. When care was offered, the resident refused, and the CNA stated that refusals were frequent but that care should still be offered regularly. Interviews with CNAs revealed a lack of communication during shift changes regarding which residents had received incontinence care. Both CNAs acknowledged the importance of regular incontinence checks and the potential for skin breakdown if residents are left wet or soiled for extended periods, but neither had received adequate handoff information from the previous shift. The findings were communicated to facility administration, with no additional information provided prior to survey exit.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙