Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Implement Comprehensive Care Plan for Dependent Resident

Leesburg, Virginia Survey Completed on 05-21-2025

Penalty

Fine: $5,712
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for one resident with severe cognitive impairment and total dependence on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). The care plan required staff to provide scheduled showers, incontinence care, and frequent monitoring of vital signs. Documentation revealed that showers were not provided on multiple scheduled dates across several months, with records marked as 'not applicable' or indicating the task was not completed. There was no evidence in the clinical record that the resident refused showers on those dates, and staff interviews confirmed that showers should have been provided and refusals documented if they occurred. In addition to missed showers, the resident's care plan required incontinence care and skin inspections with each episode and every shift. However, ADL documentation showed gaps where incontinence care was not recorded as provided on several shifts, with entries either left blank or marked 'not applicable.' Again, there was no documentation of refusals for incontinence care, and staff interviews confirmed the expectation that care and refusals should be documented in the electronic medical record. The care plan also included an intervention to monitor vital signs every two hours due to a history of poor intake, hypernatremia, and recent fever. Despite a physician's order for vital signs every two hours, the clinical record showed that vital signs were not documented at the required frequency, with only sporadic entries over the relevant period. Staff interviews confirmed that vital signs were to be monitored and documented as ordered. The facility's policy on care plan revisions did not provide guidance on implementing the care plan, and administrative staff were made aware of these concerns during the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙