Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Provide Safe and Comprehensive Discharge Planning

Leesburg, Virginia Survey Completed on 05-21-2025

Penalty

Fine: $5,712
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to provide a safe and comprehensive discharge for a resident with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease and alcoholism. The resident's clinical record documented ongoing alcohol abuse, multiple falls, unsteady gait, and unintentional weight loss. Despite these complex needs, the discharge process lacked a clear and coordinated plan, with the resident's substance abuse issues not addressed in the discharge planning. The resident was issued a 30-day notice of discharge due to nonpayment, but the notice did not specify a discharge date or destination, and there was no evidence in the record of when the resident received this notice. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the social services team was not fully involved in the discharge planning until the final days before discharge. The social worker assigned to the case was instructed by an administrative staff member to find placement for the resident, including the option of paying for a hotel stay, but expressed discomfort with this plan and attempted to find a shelter instead. The discharge plan was changed multiple times, and the final discharge location was not clearly documented. The social worker was not aware of the resident's alcohol dependency and stated that substance abuse counseling should have been included in the discharge plan, but it was not. Facility policy requires that discharge notices include the discharge date and destination, and that significant changes to the plan be communicated with updated notices. The policy also requires a post-discharge plan of care developed with the resident's participation, including orientation to the new environment and documentation of discussions with the resident or their representative. In this case, the documentation did not include a clear discharge plan, discharge location, or evidence of a safe and orderly transition, particularly in light of the resident's medical and behavioral needs.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙