Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0607
D

Failure to Implement Abuse Prevention Policies and Investigate Exploitation Allegation

Leesburg, Virginia Survey Completed on 05-21-2025

Penalty

Fine: $5,712
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to implement the abuse prevention policy for six contract employees by not conducting or documenting required criminal background checks prior to their work in the facility. The contract workers, including construction workers and electricians, were hired without evidence of background checks as stipulated by facility policy. When questioned, the regional administrator acknowledged accepting foreign background checks without verifying if they met regulatory requirements, and could not confirm compliance with state or federal standards. Additionally, the facility did not follow its policy to report and investigate an allegation of resident exploitation involving one resident. The resident’s daughter raised concerns about possible financial exploitation by a friend, which was communicated to the social worker and the Ombudsman. Although Adult Protective Services (APS) was contacted and later closed the case, there was no evidence that the allegation was reported to the state agency or that an internal investigation was conducted as required by facility policy. Interviews with facility leadership confirmed that allegations of exploitation should be reported immediately to the administrator or DON, and then to the state agency and APS, followed by an internal investigation. However, the administrator was unable to provide documentation of a report to the state agency or evidence of an investigation into the exploitation allegation prior to the survey exit.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙