Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0600
D

Failure to Provide Timely Incontinence Care Results in Neglect

Leesburg, Virginia Survey Completed on 05-21-2025

Penalty

Fine: $5,712
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to provide timely incontinence care for two residents with severe cognitive impairment and total incontinence. For one resident with dementia, continuous observation over a four-hour and seventeen-minute period revealed that neither nursing nor CNA staff checked or performed incontinence care. When care was finally attempted, the resident was found with a saturated incontinence brief containing both urine and feces, some of which was dried on the skin. Staff interviews confirmed that incontinence care should be provided every two hours, and that failure to do so constitutes neglect. In the case of another resident with a history of stroke and severe cognitive impairment, a similar period of observation showed that no incontinence care was provided by staff. When a CNA attempted to offer care, the resident refused, but the CNA acknowledged that care should still be offered every two hours regardless of refusals. Staff interviews reiterated the expectation for two-hour checks and identified lack of such care as neglect. Both incidents were brought to the attention of facility administration, including the administrator, director of nursing, and regional administrator. No additional information or corrective actions were provided prior to the survey exit.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙