Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0700
D

Failure to Assess and Attempt Alternatives Prior to Bedrail Use

Richmond, Virginia Survey Completed on 04-28-2025

Penalty

Fine: $93,440
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to assess and attempt alternatives prior to the use of bedrails for one resident. The resident, who had a history of right above the knee amputation, atherosclerosis, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease, was cognitively intact and required varying levels of assistance with self-care activities. Despite these needs, there was no documentation in the clinical record of any alternatives being tried before bedrails were implemented, nor was there evidence of a bedrail assessment. Observations showed the resident with bilateral bedrails in use on multiple occasions, both while in bed and seated at the bedside. During an interview, the resident expressed a preference for bedrails but could not recall requesting them or being informed of their risks and benefits. The record review confirmed the absence of documentation regarding alternatives, their effectiveness, or informed consent. Facility leadership did not provide comments or concerns when interviewed about these findings.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙