Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Administer Physician-Ordered Eye Drops and Inadequate Documentation

Harrisonburg, Virginia Survey Completed on 04-11-2025

Penalty

Fine: $116,624
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to administer Latanoprost eye drops as ordered by the physician for a resident with glaucoma. The resident reported during an interview that he frequently did not receive his prescribed eye drops. Review of the clinical record and medication administration record (MAR) confirmed that the eye drops were not administered on two specific dates, with one date left blank on the MAR and the other marked as held, without any documentation explaining the omission. The physician's order for the eye drops had been active since February and remained so at the time of the survey. Interviews with the DON and two LPNs revealed that medication administration was inconsistent, particularly when medications were not available or when agency staff were unaware of where extra supplies were stored. The facility's policy required medications to be administered as ordered and documented immediately after administration, but this was not followed in the resident's case. No documentation was provided in the nursing progress notes to explain why the medication was not given, and the DON acknowledged that blanks on the MAR indicated the medication was not administered and should have been explained.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙