Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
E

Failure to Document Advance Directive Discussions and Properly Complete Forms

Roanoke, Virginia Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for 21 of 24 sampled residents, specifically regarding documentation of advance directives and related communications. In multiple cases, staff did not document verbal communication with residents or their representatives about the reasons for refusing treatments such as oral suction and oxygen, as indicated on advance directive forms. Additionally, there was no documentation that education was provided to residents or their representatives about the consequences or potential outcomes of refusing these treatments, despite facility policy requiring such documentation. For example, one resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses, including Alzheimer's disease and dementia, had an advance directive indicating refusal of oral suction and oxygen. However, there was no evidence in the clinical record of staff assessment or documentation of the reasons for this refusal, nor of any education provided to the resident or representative about the implications of these choices. Similar deficiencies were found for other residents, including those who were cognitively intact, where staff failed to document the required discussions and education related to advance directive decisions. Furthermore, the facility staff did not ensure that advance directive forms were completed according to the form's instructions. Instead of having the individual providing the information initial the desired areas, staff marked the forms with checkmarks or Xs. This failure to follow documentation procedures was identified for 21 residents. These deficiencies were confirmed through interviews with residents, family members, and staff, as well as reviews of clinical records and facility policies.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙