Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
E

Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Residents with Catheters and Wounds

Panguitch, Utah Survey Completed on 06-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program by not implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for residents with wounds and indwelling urinary catheters. Specifically, three residents with either suprapubic catheters or open wounds did not have EBP signage in their rooms, and staff practices were inconsistent with EBP protocols. For example, one resident with a suprapubic catheter reported that staff only wore gloves when handling the catheter but never wore gowns, and there was no EBP signage present in the room. Another resident with a stage III coccyx ulceration and drainage also lacked EBP signage, despite ongoing wound care and offloading measures documented in the medical record. Interviews with staff, including the DON, MDS Coordinator, CNA, and Infection Preventionist, revealed inconsistent understanding and implementation of EBP. While some staff stated they would wear gowns when emptying catheters, others only used gloves for certain care activities. The Infection Preventionist acknowledged that EBP should be in place for residents with urinary catheters or open wounds and that signage should be posted, but this was not consistently done. These findings were based on direct observation, interviews, and record review.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙