Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0804
E

Deficiency in Food Quality, Palatability, and Temperature

Ivins, Utah Survey Completed on 05-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide food that was consistently palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature for multiple residents. Nine residents reported various concerns, including repetitive and unappealing menu options, such as hot dogs being served multiple times a week, tough and hard-to-chew meats, and food that was cold or not visually appealing. One resident, who was previously vegan, noted a lack of raw fruits and vegetables and described the vegetables as overcooked, while another resident reported not receiving requested food items. Several residents described the food as bland, unappetizing, or not tasting good, with one resident stating he purchased his own food due to dissatisfaction with the facility's meals. A test tray evaluation revealed that the food served was not attractive or palatable, with undercooked rice, tough chicken, and dull-colored beets. The temperature of the food was also below recommended standards, with the chicken and rice at 112.7°F and the beets at 108.3°F. The combination of gravies and sauces on the chicken and rice was described as having conflicting flavors, further detracting from the meal's palatability. The posted menu did not match the meal served, and the dessert was store-bought pie, which was not prepared in-house. Dining Committee meeting minutes over several months documented ongoing complaints from residents about food quality, including issues with food temperature, texture, doneness, and flavor. Specific complaints included cold food, undercooked or overcooked vegetables and meats, bland taste, and inconsistencies in meal preparation. Interviews with the Registered Dietitian and Dietary Manager confirmed that food quality concerns were raised regularly, though they believed the same residents typically voiced these issues. The Administrator was unaware of the extent of food concerns, despite mechanisms in place for residents to file grievances or use a QR code to report complaints.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙