Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
E

Failure to Implement and Adhere to Enhanced Barrier Precautions and Infection Control Protocols

Clearfieldd, Utah Survey Completed on 07-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Surveyors identified that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for three out of twenty-six sampled residents. Staff were observed not donning required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), not performing hand hygiene during dressing changes, and engaging in cross-contamination during a central line dressing change. Specifically, signage for PPE requirements was inconsistently marked, and staff demonstrated confusion regarding when and what type of PPE was necessary for care activities involving residents with indwelling devices or wounds. For one resident with a central line for IV antibiotic administration due to infective endocarditis, staff did not wear a gown during medication administration or dressing changes, despite EBP policy requiring both gown and gloves for such high-contact care. Additionally, hand hygiene was not performed prior to donning sterile gloves, and improper technique was used when cleaning the central line insertion site, with the nurse going back over the insertion site after cleaning outward. The PPE signage outside the resident’s room was not properly marked until after the dressing change, and staff interviews revealed a lack of understanding about EBP requirements. Other residents with wounds, feeding tubes, or indwelling urinary catheters also had EBP signage posted, but staff were observed providing care and assistance, including transfers and therapy, without donning the required PPE. Interviews with staff indicated inconsistent knowledge and application of EBP protocols, and in some cases, there were no physician orders for EBP found in the records. The facility’s policy required gown and gloves for high-contact care activities for residents with wounds or indwelling devices, but these procedures were not consistently followed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙