Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0693
D

Failure to Maintain Head-of-Bed Elevation During Enteral Feeding

Dallas, Texas Survey Completed on 06-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident receiving enteral feeding via a gastrostomy tube was observed lying flat in bed while the feeding pump was running. The resident's care plan and physician orders specifically required the head of the bed to be elevated between 30 to 45 degrees during tube feeding and for at least 30 minutes afterward to prevent aspiration. Despite these documented requirements, the resident was found with the bed flat and the feeding pump actively delivering nutrition. Interviews with staff, including a CNA and an LVN, revealed that neither was aware of who had lowered the bed, and both stated they were trained to keep the head of the bed elevated during tube feeding. The staff also confirmed that the risk of aspiration was well known, and the facility's policy required the head of the bed to be elevated during feedings. The resident's family reported that on multiple occasions, they found the bed flat during visits and had to request staff to raise it, indicating a recurring issue. Further interviews with facility leadership, including the DON and ADM, confirmed the expectation that the head of the bed should be elevated during tube feedings. The ADM acknowledged that the resident had a tendency to lay the bed flat and that this behavior was known among staff but had not been specifically care planned. The facility's policy and staff statements consistently supported the need for bed elevation during enteral feeding, but this was not consistently implemented for the resident in question.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙