Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Incomplete and Inaccurate Documentation of Insulin Administration Parameters

Beaumont, Texas Survey Completed on 07-30-2025

Penalty

Fine: $50,460
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the medical record for one resident was complete and accurately documented, specifically regarding the parameters for holding insulin administration. The resident, who had diagnoses including Type II diabetes and dementia with severe cognitive impairment, had physician orders and MARs that inconsistently documented the blood glucose (BG) threshold for holding Novolog insulin. The physician order and MAR initially stated to hold insulin if BG was less than 200, but nursing staff and the nurse practitioner indicated that the correct threshold should have been 100. A nurse made a typographical error when entering the order into the electronic record, and this discrepancy was not identified or corrected in a timely manner. Despite the error in documentation, nursing staff reported that they consistently held the insulin if the resident's BG was less than 100, following standard nursing judgment rather than the incorrect written order. The facility's policy required that each resident's medical record contain an accurate and complete representation of the resident's care, but the error in the electronic record and MAR resulted in inaccurate documentation of the resident's insulin administration parameters.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙