Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Coding of Range of Motion Limitations for Two Residents

Groves, Texas Survey Completed on 07-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the range of motion (ROM) limitations for two residents. For one resident, the most recent quarterly MDS assessment did not capture the contracture of her left knee, despite her medical record, care plan, and staff interviews confirming a longstanding contracture and associated interventions such as positioning for comfort and prevention of further contracture. The resident herself reported an inability to straighten her left knee for years, and both the care plan and staff acknowledged the contracture and related care needs. However, the MDS was coded as having no functional limitations to her extremities, based on the MDS nurse's interpretation that the contracture was the resident's baseline normal. For the second resident, the significant change MDS assessment failed to document contractures and ROM limitations on her right side, including her right elbow, hip, and knee, as well as a right below-the-knee amputation (BKA). The resident's care plan addressed only the contracture of her right elbow and did not mention the hip and knee contractures. Observations and staff interviews confirmed the presence of these contractures and the BKA, with care interventions in place for positioning and protection. The MDS, however, was coded as having no impairment in ROM or functional limitation, again based on the MDS nurse's rationale that these conditions were the resident's baseline. Interviews with facility staff, including the former MDS nurse, DON, and Regional Director of Clinical Operations, confirmed that the MDS assessments did not accurately reflect the residents' actual ROM limitations. The staff acknowledged that the inaccurate coding could result in care plans that do not fully address the residents' needs. The facility did not have a specific MDS policy and relied on the RAI manual for assessment and coding instructions.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙