Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
E

Failure to Update and Revise Care Plans Following Significant Changes

San Antonio, Texas Survey Completed on 08-23-2025

Penalty

Fine: $32,580
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both comprehensive and quarterly review assessments, to reflect the current condition of two residents. For one resident with a history of cerebral infarction, anxiety disorder, hemiplegia, and depression, the care plan did not include documentation of a hospitalization for suicidal ideation or a subsequent attempt to injure herself. Despite clear evidence in the medical record and psychiatric evaluation indicating the resident's risk for self-harm and recommendations for closer observation, the care plan was not updated to reflect these significant events or the recommended interventions. Another resident, diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, dementia, high blood pressure, and anxiety disorder, experienced a significant decline and multiple falls. Although the resident was provided with a geriatric chair by hospice as a fall prevention measure after a hospital visit, this intervention was not added to the care plan. Staff interviews confirmed the use of the geriatric chair for fall prevention, but the care plan only reflected other interventions such as being up at the nurses’ station when anxious and scheduled care planning with family and hospice. The omission of the geriatric chair as an intervention was acknowledged by the MDS nurse, who could not provide a reason for its absence from the care plan. The facility’s policy required that care plans be reviewed and revised upon any status change, with the interdisciplinary team collaborating on intervention options and updating the care plan accordingly. However, in both cases, the care plans were not updated to reflect significant changes in the residents’ conditions or the interventions being used, as evidenced by record reviews, staff interviews, and direct observations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙