Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Urology Referral and PEG Site Care

Selmer, Tennessee Survey Completed on 07-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow physician's orders regarding a urology referral and did not obtain an order for PEG site care for two residents. For one resident, after being readmitted with multiple diagnoses including hydronephrosis, renal calculous obstruction, and sepsis, a physician's order was given for a urology referral following a stent placement. Despite documentation of the need for a referral and communication with the physician's office, the appointment was never made. Additionally, the resident's care plan was not updated to reflect their post-hospitalization status. Interviews with nursing staff and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the urology appointment was not scheduled as ordered. For another resident with a PEG tube, there was no physician's order for PEG site care documented in the medical record or on the Treatment Administration Record for several months. Nursing staff confirmed the absence of an order and indicated that care should have been performed daily and documented, but there was no formal process in place to ensure this without an order. Observation of the resident's PEG site showed it was clean and dry, but the lack of an order and documentation represented a failure to follow required procedures for PEG site care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙