Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Implement Bowel and Bladder Continence Program

Jefferson City, Tennessee Survey Completed on 06-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to restore continence of bowel and bladder for one resident with multiple diagnoses, including cerebral palsy, epilepsy, congestive heart failure, muscle weakness, and diabetes mellitus. The resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, had moderate cognitive impairment, and was dependent on staff and a mechanical lift for transfers. Despite facility policies requiring assessment and implementation of interventions to restore continence, the resident's care plan only included general interventions such as assistance with toileting and peri-care as needed, and reminders to call for assistance. There was no evidence of a toileting, timed, or scheduled voiding program being implemented. Medical record reviews showed that the resident was identified as a candidate for toileting, timed, or scheduled voiding based on two separate evaluations, and the urinary incontinence tool indicated the resident could comprehend instructions and participate in such a program. However, documentation for a 30-day period confirmed the resident remained incontinent 100% of the time, and interviews with staff, including an LPN, CNA, and the DON, confirmed that no toileting program had been initiated. The DON acknowledged that the resident should have been placed on a toileting program according to the assessment tools used.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙