Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Inaccurate Documentation of Dialysis Access Site Assessments

Morristown, Tennessee Survey Completed on 06-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the medical record for a resident receiving dialysis was complete and accurate, specifically regarding documentation of dialysis access site assessments. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including dependence on renal dialysis and end stage renal disease, and had a permacath in the right upper chest for dialysis access. Facility policy required accurate recordkeeping, and physician orders directed staff to assess the dialysis access site for thrill, bruit, and bleeding every shift. However, review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed that LPNs documented assessments of a 'shunt site' for thrill and bruit, even though the resident did not have a shunt but rather a permacath. Interviews with the LPNs revealed that they were aware the resident's dialysis access was a permacath and that they assessed the site for signs of bleeding and infection, but they failed to accurately document these assessments in the MAR, instead recording assessments for a shunt site. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the documentation did not accurately reflect the assessments performed on the resident's actual dialysis access site during the specified period.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙