Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0688
E

Failure to Provide Consistent Restorative Nursing Program for Residents at Risk for ROM Decline

Britton, South Dakota Survey Completed on 06-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Surveyors identified that the facility failed to ensure an ongoing restorative nursing program was completed according to the care planned needs for all twelve sampled residents at risk for a decline in range of motion (ROM). Observations, interviews, and record reviews revealed that restorative programs were not consistently provided as ordered or care planned. For example, one resident expressed a desire for daily restorative exercises and noted that his program was only completed once a week, with significant gaps in documentation and actual provision of services. The restorative aide confirmed that she was frequently reassigned to CNA duties, resulting in missed restorative sessions for residents. Review of electronic medical records (EMRs) for all twelve residents showed inconsistent and infrequent documentation of restorative care. Many days were marked as 'Not Applicable' for the provision of ROM exercises, and in several cases, there were only a handful of days within a 30-day period where restorative interventions were documented as completed. Some residents were noted as 'Not Available' or 'Refused,' but the majority of days lacked any indication that restorative care was attempted or provided, despite care plans and referral forms specifying the frequency and type of interventions required. Interviews with residents and staff further corroborated the lack of consistent restorative care. While some residents reported satisfaction with the program, others, including family members, questioned the adequacy of services, especially in relation to discharge planning and maintenance of function. Staff interviews revealed that the restorative aide's frequent reassignment to CNA duties directly impacted the ability to deliver restorative programs as scheduled. The facility's own documentation and staff statements confirmed that the restorative nursing program was not implemented as care planned for residents at risk for ROM decline.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙