Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Ensure Consistent Documentation of Advance Directives and Code Status

Madison, South Dakota Survey Completed on 07-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure accurate and consistent documentation of a resident's advance directives and code status. Record review showed that the resident, who had moderate cognitive impairment, had conflicting information regarding her wishes for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Her advance directive, signed by the resident, indicated she did not want CPR, while a separate CPR Statement of Decision form, signed by her power of attorney and physician, indicated she did want CPR. The electronic medical record (EMR) listed her as do not resuscitate (DNR), and her physician had ordered DNR status in the EMR. However, the paper chart contained the conflicting CPR Statement of Decision form, and staff referenced both the paper chart and EMR to determine code status. Interviews with nursing staff revealed confusion regarding which document reflected the resident's true wishes, as the paper chart and EMR did not match. Staff indicated that the CPR Statement of Decision form was reviewed quarterly with the family, but discrepancies persisted. The director of nursing confirmed that code status should match in both the EMR and paper chart. Facility policy stated that advance directives would be honored and that residents have the right to formulate such directives, but the inconsistent documentation led to uncertainty about the resident's actual code status.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙