Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Failure to Accurately Document Pressure Ulcer on Assessment and MDS

Columbia, South Carolina Survey Completed on 07-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected the status of a pressure ulcer for one resident. Upon readmission, the resident returned with a sacral pressure ulcer, which was noted in the initial head-to-toe skin check and provider communication log. However, subsequent weekly skin assessments failed to document the presence of the wound, and the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment did not indicate the existence of a pressure ulcer, despite physician orders for wound care being in place. The MDS Coordinator relied on nursing documentation, which incorrectly showed the resident's skin as intact during the lookback period, leading to inaccurate reporting on the MDS. Interviews revealed that the facility did not have a dedicated wound care nurse, and wound care responsibilities were shared among nursing staff, with oversight from a wound care provider and nurse practitioner during weekly rounds. The Director of Nursing stated that unit managers are responsible for admission assessments, while floor nurses are expected to document ongoing skin issues. The deficiency resulted from incomplete and inaccurate documentation of the resident's pressure ulcer status in both the skin assessments and the MDS, despite clear evidence of the wound in other records.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙