Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0553
D

Failure to Incorporate Resident Preferences into Care Plan

Scranton, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 08-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor and incorporate a resident's expressed preferences and choices into the care planning process. A resident with alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver and ascites, who was cognitively intact, was admitted to the facility and had a physician's order for Prevalon boots to be worn while in or out of bed, with removal allowed for hygiene and skin checks. The resident's care plan included goals to prevent deterioration in activities of daily living (ADL) functional status, and nursing documentation indicated the boots were initiated for preventive care. However, clinical records, nursing progress notes, and the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) documented multiple instances where the resident refused to wear the boots and was re-educated on their purpose. Despite repeated refusals and clear documentation of the resident's choice not to wear the Prevalon boots, the resident's expressed preference was not incorporated into the comprehensive care plan. Observations confirmed the resident was not wearing the boots during multiple checks, and the resident verbally confirmed their preference not to use them. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the resident's choice was not addressed in the care plan, which is inconsistent with the facility's policy to develop person-centered care plans focused on resident choices and abilities.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙