Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
E

Delayed Call Bell Response Times Impact Resident Care

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 07-31-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to respond to resident call bells in a timely manner, as required by its own policy and confirmed by staff interviews and electronic call bell logs. The policy specified that staff should respond to call lights within 15 minutes. However, review of call bell logs for three residents revealed 16 instances where response times exceeded this standard, ranging from 19 to 91 minutes. Interviews with the affected residents confirmed that they experienced significant delays in receiving assistance, which impacted their ability to receive care and services promptly. The residents involved had significant medical needs, including diagnoses such as pneumonia, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, cerebral infarction with hemiplegia, urinary tract infection, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. All required staff assistance for activities of daily living and were at risk for falls. Care plans for these residents included interventions to ensure call bells were within reach and to encourage their use for assistance. Despite these interventions, the delays in call bell response times were confirmed by both resident interviews and facility documentation.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙