Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
E

Failure to Assess and Implement Toileting Programs for Residents with Urinary Incontinence

Hatboro, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 05-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide appropriate care for residents with urinary incontinence, specifically by not implementing assessments or interventions aimed at maintaining, restoring, or improving bladder function for two residents. For one resident, who was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for toileting, there was no documentation of a voiding study or toileting trial to determine voiding patterns or the type of incontinence. Despite the resident expressing a desire to participate in a toileting program and being able to communicate toileting needs, staff confirmed that no such program or assessment had been initiated, and the resident continued to use briefs. Similarly, another resident, who was alert, oriented, and dependent on staff for transfers and turning in bed, was frequently incontinent of urine and at risk for pressure ulcers. This resident also expressed willingness to use a bedpan instead of a brief and was able to communicate toileting needs to staff. However, there was no documentation of a voiding study or toileting trial for this resident either. Staff interviews confirmed the resident's abilities and needs, but no interventions or assessments were documented or implemented to address urinary incontinence as required by facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙