Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
D

Failure to Thoroughly Investigate Alleged Verbal and Mental Abuse

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 08-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into allegations of verbal and mental abuse involving a resident with multiple chronic conditions, including Multiple Sclerosis, Fibromyalgia, and bipolar disorder, who was alert, oriented, and able to make autonomous choices. Two separate incidents were reported in which a staff member allegedly used derogatory language toward the resident. The facility's policy requires a comprehensive investigation, including interviews with all relevant witnesses and staff, but this was not completed as required. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged knowing the identities of both the alleged perpetrator and the supervisor involved in disciplining the staff member, yet failed to include their witness statements in the investigation. Additionally, the investigation was deemed unsubstantiated primarily because the accused staff member had resigned and no other staff or residents reported hearing the incident. The omission of key witness statements and incomplete documentation led to the deficiency in the facility's response to the alleged abuse.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙