Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Establish Escort Screening Process for Resident Leave of Absence

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 05-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to establish criteria or a screening process for determining the suitability of escorts for residents approved for an escorted leave of absence. According to facility policy, residents requesting a leave of absence must have a physician's order indicating the leave is safe, and if an independent leave is deemed unsafe, an escorted leave may be considered. However, the facility did not define the role or qualifications of a safe escort, nor did it have a process to screen or approve individuals serving as escorts. In the case reviewed, a resident with a history of opioid use disorder and drug and alcohol abuse was granted an escorted leave of absence by physician order due to a family emergency. The resident left the facility with a friend who was not listed as an approved visitor or contact in the resident's records. Nursing documentation indicated that the resident was expected to return the same day but did not return as scheduled. Attempts to contact the resident throughout the night were unsuccessful. The following day, the resident's daughter informed the facility that the resident had died from a drug overdose while on leave. Interviews with facility staff, including the administrator and LPN, confirmed that there was no established process to define or screen escorts for safety, and the individual who escorted the resident was not previously identified as a visitor or contact.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙