Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0559
E

Failure to Provide Written Notice Prior to Facility-Initiated Room Changes

Tamaqua, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 06-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide written notice, including the reason for a room change, to residents and/or their representatives prior to facility-initiated room changes for three of eight residents reviewed. Clinical record reviews showed that residents were moved from their original rooms to different wings within the facility without any documented evidence that written notification or explanation was given in advance. This included one resident who was cognitively intact and another who was moderately cognitively impaired, as indicated by a BIMS score of 12. Both residents and their representatives were not informed in writing about the reason for the move, nor were they given the opportunity to refuse the room change or to be involved in the process as required by federal regulations. Interviews with the affected residents revealed that they were not told why their rooms were being changed and were not made aware of their right to refuse the move. One resident expressed frustration at being moved after over a year in the same room and stated that she would have refused the change if she had been informed of her rights. The Nursing Home Administrator was unable to provide any documentation showing that written explanations were given to the residents or their representatives prior to the room changes.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙