Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0695
D

Failure to Provide Required Tracheostomy Care and Documentation

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 06-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for a resident with a tracheostomy. Facility policy required daily tracheostomy care and as-needed dressing changes, including removal of the drain/dressing sponge and cleaning around the stoma site and trach plate. Review of the resident's care plan indicated interventions such as ensuring trach ties were secured, suctioning as needed, monitoring for changes in status, and using universal precautions. However, the resident reported that tracheostomy care was not performed daily by nursing staff, and observations confirmed the presence of a tracheostomy with a cap in use. Further review of the clinical record revealed a physician order for a #8 shiley cuffless tracheostomy tube, but observation and staff interview identified the resident was actually using a #6 shiley cuffless tube, indicating a discrepancy in documentation. There was no documented evidence of physician orders or a comprehensive care plan for the daily care of the tracheostomy or for the management of the cap. Staff confirmed the lack of physician orders and documentation for daily tracheostomy care and cap management, constituting a failure to follow resident care policies and nursing service requirements.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙