Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
E

Failure to Individualize Care Plans for High-Risk Wandering Residents

Oakmont, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 05-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents identified as high risk for wandering or elopement had person-centered care plans individualized to their specific needs. Eight residents with diagnoses such as dementia, depression, heart failure, and Alzheimer's disease were identified as having behaviors or histories that placed them at risk for wandering or elopement. Each of these residents had completed elopement evaluations indicating risk factors such as aimless wandering, history of elopement attempts, and verbal expressions of wanting to leave the facility. Despite these individualized risk factors, a review of the care plans for all eight residents revealed that the plans were nearly identical, lacking specific interventions or goals tailored to each resident's unique needs and behaviors. The care plans included generic goals such as maintaining resident safety, ensuring happiness with daily routines, and preventing residents from leaving the facility unattended. Interventions listed were also generic, including assessing for fall risk, providing diversions, monitoring for fatigue, and offering structured activities, without any customization based on the resident's personal history or preferences. The facility's own policies required comprehensive, person-centered care plans with measurable objectives and timetables, as well as ongoing assessment and revision as resident conditions changed. However, interviews and documentation confirmed that the facility did not meet these requirements for the eight residents at high risk for wandering or elopement, resulting in a deficiency under state regulations for admissions policy and nursing services.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙