Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
K

Failure to Notify Physicians and Assess for Diabetic Emergencies

Monroeville, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 07-03-2025

Penalty

Fine: $37,480
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to notify physicians of elevated or decreased capillary blood glucose (CBG) levels and did not assess residents for hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, resulting in immediate jeopardy for six residents. Facility policy required staff to report complications such as hypoglycemia and to notify providers of significant changes in blood glucose levels, but multiple instances were found where blood sugar values outside of ordered parameters were not communicated to physicians or followed up on. For example, one resident had numerous blood glucose readings above 400 mg/dL over several months without documentation of physician notification or follow-up, despite physician orders to notify for values above 400 mg/dL. Another resident experienced a severe hypoglycemic event, with a blood sugar of 31 mg/dL, and was transferred to the hospital, but there was no evidence of timely intervention or notification as required by policy and physician orders. Several other residents with diabetes had repeated episodes of blood glucose levels outside of the parameters set by their physicians, with no documentation of notification or follow-up. These included blood glucose readings both above and below the thresholds that should have triggered immediate action according to facility policy and physician orders. In some cases, residents were admitted to the hospital for complications related to hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia, and documentation showed that staff failed to recognize or respond to these acute changes in condition as required. The facility's own policies, as well as manufacturer instructions for glucometers and insulin, outlined clear procedures for monitoring, documenting, and responding to abnormal blood glucose levels. However, review of clinical records, staff interviews, and policy documents revealed that these procedures were not consistently followed. The failure to notify physicians and assess residents for acute diabetic complications directly contributed to adverse outcomes and placed residents in immediate jeopardy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙