Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0680
E

Failure to Accurately Assess and Document Resident Activity Preferences

Monroeville, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 07-03-2025

Penalty

Fine: $37,480
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the Activities Director accurately completed, directed, or delegated the accurate completion of the activities component of the comprehensive assessment for residents, particularly those with severe cognitive impairment. Review of facility documents, clinical records, and staff interviews revealed that for 28 residents with severe cognitive impairment, there was no attempt to obtain information on resident preferences from family, significant others, or staff interviews, as required when residents are unable to communicate their preferences directly. Instead, the assessments consistently documented that all activity preference questions were answered as 'Very Important' and that this information was obtained from the resident, even when the resident's cognitive status indicated they were unable to reliably communicate such preferences. Analysis of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessments showed a pattern of uniform responses. Of the 100 assessments reviewed, 66 were completed by the Activities Director, with 92.4% of these having all answers marked as 'Very Important.' Similar patterns were observed in assessments completed by other staff, with a high percentage of uniform responses and little variation, regardless of the resident's cognitive ability. In several cases, residents had BIMS scores indicating severe cognitive impairment or were rarely understood, yet the documentation still reflected that all preferences were obtained directly from the resident and marked as 'Very Important.' Interviews with the Activities Director confirmed responsibility for completing the activities component of the MDS and acknowledged the uniformity of responses, attributing it to the answers provided during interviews. However, there was no evidence that alternative sources, such as family or staff, were consulted for residents unable to communicate their preferences. The deficiency was communicated to the Nursing Home Administrator, highlighting the facility's failure to follow required procedures for accurately assessing and documenting resident activity preferences, especially for those with severe cognitive impairment.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙