Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0691
E

Failure to Document and Order Urostomy Care for Resident

Gettysburg, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 06-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide proper urostomy care for a resident with a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder and a urostomy. Review of the facility's policy indicated that documentation of ostomy care should include the date and time care was provided, the name and title of the caregiver, any skin issues or signs of infection, the resident's tolerance of the procedure, refusals and interventions, and the signature of the person recording the data. However, the resident's clinical record did not contain documentation of urostomy care after March 23, 2025, and there was no physician order specifying the details of urostomy care. The care plan referenced care as ordered by the physician, skin nurse, or charge nurse, but lacked current, specific interventions or documentation. Interviews with the resident revealed that she independently performed her own urostomy care and was comfortable doing so. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident managed her own care and requested supplies as needed to maintain independence. Despite this, the DON acknowledged that there should have been a physician order detailing urostomy care and that the provision of care should have been documented in the clinical record, in accordance with facility policy and regulatory requirements.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙