Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate Resident Assessments Identified

Newville, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 07-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected the residents' clinical status for three of nineteen residents reviewed. For one resident with diabetes mellitus and neuropathy, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment did not indicate that the resident received an anticonvulsant medication, despite the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showing administration of gabapentin during the assessment period. For another resident with dementia and anxiety disorder, the MDS was coded to show receipt of a hypnotic medication, but the MAR did not document administration of such medication during the same period. Additionally, a third resident with type 2 diabetes mellitus and edema was found to have an unstageable pressure injury to the right heel that originated after admission. However, two MDS assessments incorrectly indicated that the pressure injury was present upon admission. These discrepancies were identified through clinical record reviews and staff interviews, demonstrating a failure to ensure the accuracy of resident assessments as required.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙