Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
G

Failure to Implement Pressure Ulcer Interventions Resulting in Wound Deterioration

Kingston, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to consistently implement planned interventions and provide necessary treatment and services to prevent the worsening of a pressure ulcer for a resident with significant cognitive impairment and multiple care needs. The resident was admitted with a Stage 2 pressure ulcer and was identified as being at moderate risk for pressure injuries, requiring total staff assistance for activities of daily living, including turning and repositioning. The care plan included specific interventions such as application of a protective barrier cream after incontinence episodes, regular turning and repositioning, weekly skin inspections, wound evaluations, and use of pressure-reducing devices. Despite these planned interventions and recommendations from the wound care consultant, documentation revealed that the recommended barrier cream was not ordered or applied as directed, and there was no consistent evidence that staff turned and repositioned the resident according to the care plan. Additionally, wound measurements and thorough evaluations were not consistently documented, making it difficult to assess the wound's progression or the effectiveness of interventions. The resident's pressure ulcer worsened from a Stage 2 to an unstageable wound, with a significant increase in size and the presence of slough, indicating a decline in skin integrity. Interviews with facility leadership confirmed the lack of evidence for implementation of the wound care consultant's recommendations, absence of a consistent turning and repositioning schedule, and insufficient evaluation of the wound's status. There was also no documentation of updated or intensified interventions in response to the worsening wound, contrary to facility policy and best practice guidelines for pressure ulcer management.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙