Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
E

Physician Failed to Document Response to Pharmacist's Medication Recommendation

Scranton, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 07-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when the attending physician failed to act upon a pharmacist's recommendation regarding a resident's medication regimen. The facility's policy requires that the attending physician document in the medical record whether a pharmacist's recommendation has been reviewed and what action, if any, has been taken. If no change is made to the medication, the physician must provide a rationale for this decision in the resident's record. In this case, the consultant pharmacist recommended a gradual dose reduction for Sertraline 25mg, an antidepressant prescribed to a resident with depressive disorder and weakness. Despite the pharmacist's recommendation, there was no documentation from the attending physician in the resident's clinical record explaining the rationale for continuing Sertraline or for rejecting the dose reduction. The DON confirmed that the physician had been notified of the recommendation via fax but had not responded as of the survey date. This failure to document and address the pharmacist's recommendation was found during a review of clinical records and staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙