Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0688
D

Failure to Provide Appropriate ROM and Mobility Services

Lewisburg, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 09-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve range of motion. The resident, who was previously able to walk 150 feet with supervision or minimal assistance and had no documented limitations, began experiencing an unsteady gait, shuffling, and difficulty lifting his right foot. Despite a request from the resident's wife for a physical therapy screen due to these mobility concerns, the initial therapy referral indicated no skilled therapy needs and no change in function. Subsequent assessments documented a decline in the resident's ability to perform activities of daily living, including increased assistance required for ambulation, toileting hygiene, and dressing. A therapy referral was eventually made for the resident's significant decline, and occupational therapy evaluated the resident, noting no further needs but referring to physical therapy for ambulation training. Physical therapy did not assess the resident until over a month later, after which a restorative ambulation program was recommended. However, the facility was unable to provide any documentation that such a restorative nursing program was implemented for the resident, despite physical therapy's recommendation and the resident's ongoing decline. Interviews with facility leadership confirmed both the delay in therapy services and the absence of evidence for the restorative program.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙