Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Routinely Assess and Document Wound Status

Lewisburg, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 09-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding wound assessment for a resident with dementia and high risk for skin breakdown. The resident was identified as having a Braden Score of 12, indicating high risk for pressure ulcers, and was noted to be incontinent of bowel and bladder. Initial documentation on June 6, 2025, identified the development of moisture-associated skin damage (MASD) on the sacrum, with measurements recorded and a fax sent to the medical provider. The care plan included the use of a moisture barrier and noted the resident's risk for altered skin integrity. Despite the initial assessment, subsequent clinical documentation repeatedly indicated that the skin issue had not been evaluated, and staff continued to document the wound as new over several months. There was no evidence that the MASD was routinely or comprehensively reassessed after the initial evaluation to determine if the wound was improving or worsening. An interview with the Director of Nursing confirmed that no further evidence of ongoing assessment could be provided.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙