Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Blood Pressure Medication Administration

Richboro, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 05-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Staff failed to follow physician orders regarding the administration of blood pressure medication for two residents. For one resident with hypertension, a physician ordered that metoprolol succinate be administered twice daily, but not if the resident's heart rate was below 60 beats per minute (BPM). Review of the Medication Administration Records (MARs) showed that the medication was administered multiple times in April and May without any documentation that the resident's heart rate was checked prior to administration, as required by the order. The Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no evidence of heart rate assessment before giving the medication. For another resident with hypertension and diabetes, a similar physician order was in place for metoprolol tartrate, specifying to withhold the medication if the heart rate was less than 60 BPM. The MARs indicated that the medication was administered on four occasions in April and May when the resident's heart rate was actually below 60 BPM. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the medication was given outside of the prescribed parameters. These findings were based on policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙